legal disputes, school hiring practices, Shenandoah County Circuit Court, nepotism, education, Loudoun County school board, Superintendent O. L. Emerick, exceptions, statutory prohibition, staff recruitment
Place
Virginia
Identifier
1012593
Is Version Of
1012593_EWP_News_clippings_002.jpg
1012593_EWP_News_clippings_002.pdf
Is Part Of
Uncategorized
Format
Jpeg Image
Publisher
Digitized by Edwin Washington Project
Rights
Loudoun County Public Schools
Language
English
Replaces
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/17 News Clippings and Publicity/Clippings/17_School_Hiring/EWP_News_clippings_002.jpg
extracted text
arshal
ndria,
brick
ccom-
Chief
ounty
Deeision on School Hiring
D'O'esn’t Apply in Loudoun
mar-
litted
Fire
that
ould | |
5
itute. _,;.,;Ifi«—fl%»_smxi}lled that
the hiring violated Seetion 2206 4
of ‘the Virginia Code, in that the
berson hired was a relative, with- D
in the specified degiee, Of fthe| .=
superintendent. B
Mr. Emerick bointed out this o
week that there ‘are exceptions | Dent
to the code provision which ap- | from
bly in Loudoun County, where at/ Louc
least two school board membpers | »ami
have members of their famjilsss host.
; 0 ces |
of the Loudoun County school
board, according to Superinten-
| dent of Schools O. L. Emerick
_He said the situation Ilocally
was covered by exceptions to the
statuatory prohibition, which did
hot apply in the Shenandoah
hat | case.
Qen
There according to news re-
~and where thei i ! &
nn intendent of schools al} \
1S~ members of his family |
in the school system. feél ge
3 ’ré;._\ J
et L
expected, and employees wh wery
employed at. the time th"'et; tHeode
provision was enacted (1938} are
¢ also exempt, - - . - ‘..9\
